Supreme Court clarifies medical education promotion rules, ruling that specific executive orders take precedence over general service rules

 

Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling in Dr. Sharmad v. State of Kerala

Civil Appeal No. 13422 of 2024 (@ SLP (C) No. 18592 of 2017)

---

Key Takeaways

1. Recruitment Rules Supersede General Rules
   The Supreme Court held that the specific recruitment rules outlined in Government Orders (G.O.) take precedence over general rules like the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules (KS & SSR).

2. Post-Qualification Experience Not Always Mandatory
   The Court clarified that where recruitment rules do not explicitly require post-qualification experience, it cannot be presumed as mandatory.

3. Judicial Review of Executive Orders
   The judgment reinforced that executive orders, such as G.O. dated April 7, 2008, govern promotions in medical education services in the absence of formal rules under Article 309.

4. Role of Literal Interpretation in Recruitment Disputes
   The Court emphasized a literal interpretation of recruitment orders, avoiding the addition of unstated requirements unless expressly specified.

5. Application of Expressio Unius Maxim
   The Court applied the maxim expressio unius est exclusio alterius to rule that the omission of post-qualification experience for teaching cadres was intentional.

---

1. Overview

Supreme Court Clarifies Recruitment Rules for Medical Education Services
In a significant judgment dated January 10, 2025, the Supreme Court addressed a contentious issue regarding promotion eligibility in Kerala’s medical education services. It ruled that recruitment under G.O. dated April 7, 2008, does not mandate post-qualification experience unless explicitly stated. The Court quashed the High Court's intervention in promotions, thereby restoring clarity to recruitment policies.

---

2. Facts of the Case

• Appellant: Dr. Sharmad, promoted as Associate Professor on February 6, 2013.
• Respondent: Dr. Jyothish, who challenged the promotion, citing insufficient post-qualification experience.

The promotion was governed by G.O. dated April 7, 2008, which did not explicitly require five years of post-qualification teaching experience. The Kerala Administrative Tribunal upheld the promotion, but the High Court reversed it. This appeal sought to resolve the conflict between executive orders and general rules.

---

3. Legal Issues

1. Does the absence of post-qualification experience in recruitment rules imply it is unnecessary?
2. Can general rules under the KS & SSR override executive orders for specific cadres?
3. Is G.O. dated December 14, 2009, relevant for promotions governed by G.O. dated April 7, 2008?

---

4. Court’s Analysis

Literal Interpretation of Recruitment Rules

• The Court observed that G.O. dated April 7, 2008, consciously excluded post-qualification experience as a criterion for teaching cadre promotions, unlike administrative cadre posts.

Application of Maxim

• The Court applied the maxim expressio unius est exclusio alterius, stating that the explicit inclusion of post-qualification experience for administrative posts implies its deliberate exclusion for teaching posts.

Role of General Rules

• KS & SSR rules, including Rule 10(ab), were deemed irrelevant since the specific executive orders supersede general rules.

Relevance of G.O. Dated December 14, 2009

• The Court ruled that reliance on G.O. dated December 14, 2009, by the High Court was misplaced, as it did not govern the specific recruitment under dispute.

---

5. Cited Cases

1. Shesharao Jangluji Bagde v. Bhaiyya Govindrao Karale

   • Citation: 1991 Supp (1) SCC 367
   • Key Takeaway: Normally, experience is expected after acquiring qualifications, but exceptions apply depending on specific recruitment rules.

2. Arun Kumar Agarwal v. State of Bihar

   • Citation: 1991 Supp (1) SCC 287
   • Key Takeaway: Candidates with higher qualifications can be preferred, provided all other conditions are equal.

3. Indian Airlines Ltd. v. S. Gopalakrishnan

   • Citation: 2001 (2) SCC 362
   • Key Takeaway: Post-qualification experience is critical unless recruitment rules explicitly state otherwise.

---

6. Judgment/Conclusion

Case Name: Dr. Sharmad v. State of Kerala
Case Number: Civil Appeal No. 13422 of 2024

Link - 

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s judgment and restored the Kerala Administrative Tribunal’s decision upholding Dr. Sharmad’s promotion. The Court ruled that the absence of explicit post-qualification experience in the recruitment rules meant it was not a mandatory requirement.

This judgment reinforces the precedence of specific executive orders over general rules, particularly in specialized recruitment contexts.